MENU

سبد خرید

0 قلم - 0 ریال

The Single Supervisory Mechanism- Panacea or Quack Banking Regulation?

ارسال به یک دوست

The Single Supervisory Mechanism- Panacea or Quack Banking Regulation?

The Single Supervisory Mechanism- Panacea or Quack Banking Regulation?

Tobias H. Troger

دریافت‌ کننده‌ :

* فیلدهای مورد نیاز

انصراف یا 

500 اقلام

فقط آنلاین

جدید

موجود می باشد

10,000 ریال
- +

Tobias H. Troger

This paper analyses the new architecture for the prudential supervision of banks in the euro area. It is primarily concerned with the likely effectiveness of the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) as a regime that intends to bolster financial stability in the steady state. By using insights from the political economy of bureaucracy it finds that the SSM is overly focused on sharp tools to discipline captured national supervisors and thus under-incentivises their top-level personnel to voluntarily contribute to rigid supervision. The success of the SSM in this regard will hinge on establishing a common supervisory culture that provides positive incentives for national supervisors. To this end, the internal decision-making structure of the European Central Bank (ECB) in supervisory matters provides some integrative elements. Yet, the complex procedures also impede swift decision making and do not adequately solve the problem. Ultimately, a careful design and animation of the ECB-defined supervisory framework and the development of inter-agency career opportunities will be critical. The ECB will become a de facto standard setter that competes with the European Banking Authority (EBA). A likely stand-off in the EBA s Board of Supervisors will lead to a growing gap in regulatory integration between SSM participants and other EU Member States. Joining the SSM as a non-euro area Member State is unattractive because the current legal framework grants no voting rights in the ECB s ultimate decisionmaking body. Nor does it supply a credible commitment opportunity for Member States that seek to bond to high-quality supervision.

نویسنده :Tobias H. Troger
تاریخ انتشار :2014
شماره نشریه :No.4
عنوان نشریه :European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR)
شماره جلد :Vol.15
شماره صفحات :pp. 449-497

No customer comments for the moment.

بررسی خود را بنویسید

The Single Supervisory Mechanism- Panacea or Quack Banking Regulation?

The Single Supervisory Mechanism- Panacea or Quack Banking Regulation?

Tobias H. Troger

بررسی خود را بنویسید

محصولات مرتبط